HOME    SEARCH    ABOUT US    CONTACT US    HELP   
           
This is an obsolete version of the rule. Please click on the rule number to view the current version.

24.213.403    ABATEMENT OF RENEWAL FEES

(1) This rule is intended to provide a process whereby the board may reduce its cash balance when the board's cash balance is excessive. This rule provides for an abatement of certain fees when that cash balance is excessive.

(2) Except as provided by (3), when the board has an excessive cash balance, the department may abate the renewal fees for its licensees or registrants for one or more renewal cycles until the board's cash balance does not exceed allowable maximums.

(a) The abatement of renewal fees may be the total amount of the renewal fee or a specified portion of that fee.

(b) If the board has more than one category of renewals, the abatement must be made on a roughly proportional basis to fairly, equitably, reasonably and economically distribute the abatement among the program's licensees or registrants. The department may, for good cause, completely abate the renewal fee for certain classes of licensees or registrants and not for other classes, if the administrative cost of processing a reduced renewal for all classes is disproportionately high. In such case, the department must attempt in any future abatements to equitably treat those classes of renewals which have borne a relatively higher proportion of renewal fees.

(c) The fact that a renewal fee is abated for any given renewal cycle does not excuse the licensee or registrant from otherwise fulfilling renewal requirements, including submission of a renewal application and any continuing education documentation. The department, to the extent it provides by rule, may impose a late penalty fee on untimely submissions of renewal applications or other required documentation.

(3) This rule will not apply when an exception to 17-2-302 , MCA, exists and is applicable to the board's cash balance. (As an example, if the board adopts a three-year renewal cycle, the board will have an apparent excess cash balance during the first year of the renewal cycle, based upon a collection of three years worth of fees for operational expense.)

(4) This rule does not relieve the board from the duty of establishing fees at a level commensurate with costs.

History: 37-1-101, 37-1-131, 37-1-134, MCA; IMP, 17-2-302, 17-2-303, 37-1-101, 37-1-131, 37-1-134, 37-1-141, MCA; NEW, 2004 MAR p. 568, Eff. 3/12/04; AMD, 2006 MAR p. 1583, Eff. 7/1/06.

Home  |   Search  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Help  |   Disclaimer  |   Privacy & Security